A boutique finance practice pairing a human Director of Finance with AI agents — so your books read like an instrument panel, not a mystery.
Every engagement runs on the same principle: find the signal in your numbers, then act on it — whether it's a one-time diagnostic or an ongoing partner.
A forensic read of your statements. Pick the depth that fits — a fast diagnostic, a full audit, or a strategic audit with a 90-day roadmap.
The financial rigor of a full-time CFO, scaled to the hours you actually need. Monthly retainer, three-month minimum.
The frameworks we use, taught volume by volume — self-paced and built for owners, not accountants.
Self-paced volumes on auditing, P&L mastery, budgeting, FP&A, and liquidity — taught the way we actually work with clients. Check back soon, or ask us to notify you at launch.
Field notes from the practice — what we're seeing in real books, written for owners and finance teams.
Working with multiple mid-size PYMES across Costa Rica, we keep finding the same five margin leaks. Here's the checklist we run first — and how to close each one before it compounds.
The budget tells you the plan. The rolling forecast tells you the truth — especially with seasonal revenue and a December aguinaldo to fund. A short case for making the 13-week your primary instrument.
When a fractional CFO is the right call for a mid-size Costa Rican PYME, when it isn't, and the specific point where the decision usually flips.
Working with multiple mid-size PYMES across Costa Rica — companies with 20 to 150 employees, doing $500K to $8M a year — we keep finding the same five margin leaks. None of them are exotic. All of them are expensive. Here's the checklist we run first on every engagement, and how to close each one before it compounds.
The typical mid-size Costa Rican PYME is paying for 12 to 20 recurring tools and services — accounting software, e-invoicing, a CRM, payroll, cloud backup, some marketing platform. Several are billed in dollars to a personal or company card, with nobody tracking the exchange rate or checking whether the tool is still in use. It's common to find two tools doing the same job, bought by two different managers at two different times. In a typical audit at this size, we find $3,000–$8,000 a year sitting in duplicate or abandoned subscriptions. The fix: a quarterly subscription review, one owner per category, and a rule that no annual plan renews without an explicit conversation.
Costa Rica's Central Bank caps card processing fees — up to 1.95% acquiring plus 1% interchange on domestic transactions, up to 2.50% acquiring on cross-border ones, plus a monthly terminal fee recently raised to ₡14,000. Those are ceilings, not fixed rates: merchants can negotiate below them, and the longer and larger a company's relationship with the bank, the more room there usually is. Most PYMES we audit are still paying whatever rate their bank assigned in year one, without ever asking again. On a business processing $80,000 a month in card volume, half a percentage point is roughly $4,800 a year — a phone call, not a project.
When raw materials, direct labor, or freight get recorded alongside administrative overhead — or the reverse — gross margin stops meaning anything. You can't price with confidence, you can't compare one product line against another, and decisions about where to invest get made on a number that doesn't reflect reality. This leak doesn't cost cash directly, but it costs decisions, which is worse.
Duplicate invoices from the same supplier. Contracts that expired but kept billing at the old rate. Purchase orders that don't match what was actually delivered. None of it surfaces unless someone is specifically looking, because each individual payment looks like a normal, approved one. In a full accounts-payable review, we typically recover 1–3% of total vendor spend just from mismatches like these.
The digital signature behind Costa Rica's e-invoicing system expires every two years. When it lapses unnoticed, Hacienda starts rejecting every comprobante issued from that point on — the business simply can't invoice until it's renewed, which is an immediate break in cash flow, not a minor accounting footnote. The other common rejections are just as quiet: outdated buyer information, an incorrect IVA breakdown, a duplicated consecutive number. Every rejected invoice is money a client can't pay until it's corrected and resent. Checking the digital signature's expiration and validating the tax breakdown before issuing should be part of the monthly close routine, not something discovered once $10,000 in invoices are stuck.
Picture a 35-person distributor in Heredia, billing around $2.5M a year. In a 48-hour diagnostic, we found its digital signature had expired eleven days earlier without anyone noticing: Hacienda had been silently rejecting comprobantes for almost two weeks, and roughly ₡4 million in invoices sat uncollectable. Renewing the signature took an afternoon. The real fix was adding the expiration date to the monthly close calendar so it doesn't happen again.
None of these five leaks is dramatic on its own. Stacked together, they're usually the difference between a PYME that feels like it's treading water and one with a clear read on where its cash actually goes. That's what a proper financial diagnostic is for — not catching fraud, but finding the slow leaks before they compound.
The annual budget tells you the plan. The 13-week cash flow forecast tells you the truth. Most mid-size PYMES in Costa Rica have the first and skip the second — exactly backwards, if cash, not the P&L, is what actually keeps the operation running.
An annual budget gets built once, usually under pressure, in the last weeks of November. It reflects assumptions that were reasonable at the time and are frequently wrong by March. A major client starts paying in 45 days instead of 30. A dollar-denominated supplier raises prices when the exchange rate moves. December's aguinaldo payment is approaching and nobody set the cash aside early. None of it shows up in the budget — it just drifts further from reality every month, while the business keeps reporting against a number that no longer means much.
Short enough to stay accurate — nobody can forecast a full year of cash movement with precision in a country with a floating exchange rate and sharp seasonality, but three months out is genuinely knowable. Long enough to see problems coming — a cash crunch in week eleven is still fixable in week one, if you see it in time. That's why the 13-week rolling forecast, not the annual budget, is the first tool we build with every fractional CFO client in month one.
The timing gap between when an invoice is issued and when the money actually lands in the bank — critical in sectors like tourism and agro-export, where high season concentrates most of the revenue into a few months while the operation runs year-round. A client who pays in 45 days instead of 30, multiplied across several invoices in the same month. The December spike from aguinaldo and social charges, which in Costa Rica adds up to roughly one extra month of payroll. The budget shows the shape of the year. The 13-week forecast shows whether the company can cover December payroll without pulling on the credit line.
Start with actual cash on hand today — in colones and in dollars, tracked separately. Add every known inflow for the next 13 weeks: confirmed invoices, recurring collections, anything with a real date attached. Subtract every known outflow: payroll, CCSS social charges, rent, vendor payments, debt service. Update it weekly against what actually happened, not what was predicted. The gap between forecast and actual is the most useful number in the whole exercise — it tells you exactly where an assumption is wrong.
A tourism services company in Guanacaste, with revenue concentrated between December and April, had an annual budget that looked healthy on paper. Building the 13-week forecast surfaced six weeks in July and August when cash would dip below what was needed to cover payroll and a dollar-denominated payment to an international supplier. The company moved the supplier payment by two weeks and activated a backup credit line before the tight point hit, not after.
The budget still matters — it's how a PYME plans strategically and talks to partners or a board. But if the business only builds one financial instrument this quarter, make it the rolling forecast. It's the one that warns you before you're already in the problem.
When a fractional CFO is the right call for a mid-size PYME in Costa Rica, when it isn't, and the specific point where the decision usually flips — without the sales pitch either way.
A full-time financial manager in Costa Rica costs, in gross salary, roughly ₡740,000 to ₡2,500,000 a month. Add the mandatory employer social charges (26.33%), the aguinaldo, and severance (cesantía) accrual, and total employer cost runs somewhere between $21,000 and $76,000 a year — before counting the three to five months it typically takes to recruit and onboard the right person. A fractional CFO, for a defined scope of hours, typically runs $12,000 to $36,000 a year. That gap is real, and it's usually the first thing anyone mentions — but it's not actually the question that should decide this.
Most mid-size PYMES in Costa Rica — with a finance team of one or two people handling accounts payable, payroll, and basic bookkeeping, but nobody dedicated to cash strategy or reporting to partners — genuinely need 8 to 15 hours a week of CFO-level thinking: monthly close, cash forecasting, the occasional strategic call. That's not a full-time job. Hiring someone full-time for that scope means paying for capacity that goes unused, or watching a talented hire get bored and leave within two years, which is its own expensive problem.
Three signals reliably indicate it's time to move to full-time: the company is preparing audited financials to qualify for a larger bank credit line and needs someone in the room with the bank daily, not on a scheduled call. It's managing a finance team of three or more and needs someone who owns performance reviews, not just deliverables. Or the business already operates across multiple entities or multiple currencies — colones and dollars, common for importers and exporters — or is evaluating an acquisition, where the finance function needs a full-time internal owner.
Fractional means nobody is fully embedded in daily operations, and the CFO's attention is shared with other clients — though the ones worth hiring bring pattern-matching from those other companies that a first-time full-time hire usually doesn't have. Full-time means a higher fixed cost, social charges, severance exposure, and a slower path to finding the right person — but the company gets someone whose only job is that business.
A 60-person manufacturer in Cartago was evaluating whether to hire a full-time financial manager. Mapping the actual workload showed they needed about 12 hours a week of financial judgment — not 40. They chose a fractional CFO instead, kept monthly close and board reporting on schedule, and saved roughly $30,000 a year against the fully loaded cost of a full-time hire. The rule we put in writing: revisit the decision the moment they raise significant outside financing or open a second legal entity.
Neither option is universally right. The honest math isn't the salary comparison — it's an honest count of how many hours of CFO-level judgment the business actually needs this quarter, and whether that number is closer to 10 or closer to 40.
No pitch, no pressure — just a 30-minute conversation about your numbers.